Stella Reddy's Story

Toxic people with narcissistic traits are cowardly and very selfish personalities to deal with. They will find fault with you, no matter the relationship and do it proudly and aggressively!! They are Nit-Pickers!

They will take everything about you and pick it apart with their personal opinions and suppositions! Even things it isn’t possible for them to know!

If they can’t find any fault in you; these toxic tenants will make something up. That’s just how convoluted and trivial they can be. They will take the most minor of things and blow it out of proportion.

Nothing shows the constant Nik-picking they did of me like their “Statement of Facts”. By picking on every little thing I did in the duty of my job, from how I delivered notices, how I wrote emails and even the things I included in them, to how I wrote hand-written notes, they think they are proving their allegations against me, but all they are doing is showing their own toxic traits. They don’t know me, no matter how familiar they claim to be!!

Geez, reading this document is like reading a manual on how I should have been doing my job, at least according to them! Toxic Tenant Bullies Original “Statement of Facts”

The sense of superiority they give by implying how I should have done my job is very on display in this document! All the nit-picking they do over every aspect of every action and word can’t be missed!! Even my personal life is picked apart by their judgements!

Take this letter I share below that was sent out to all the Tenants in the property notifying them of their domain, stellareddy.com. This is clear evidence that shows they own that site and they wrote all the contents within it. Writing as an Anonymous person was a waste of time…I wasn’t even working there in April 2019 when this was sent so their allegation that I placed Order released from LTB there is false.

The sentences in capital letters are what I want you to see, as it clearly says ” AND THEY NEVER FIRED HER” based on the allegations they have been spewing of racism against me with anyone who would listen.

They actually had the arrogance to expect the property owners to fire me from my job just based on their vague allegations of a “prior meeting” they claim we had that they wrote about in some 7-page letter.

They complain the owners never went to them, even after they expressly told them not to in that same letter. Remember, they already had 859kennedyroad.com online since November 2, 2017, so this site was the 2nd one!!

They thought it would be more hurtful to me if it was in my personal name, and they were right, it was more demoralizing for me in my personal name, filled with all their criticisms and judgements.

The thing I had to learn was that their many personal criticisms and judgements were not important. Opinions are the lowest forms of thought that a person can spew, are not based on facts and cannot be proven with evidence. It is just a thought that has no power, unless you give it some, as I did.

I allowed their opinions to get to me as I was feeling such shame over getting caught up in all this mess. Once I released the shame, I also released the power of their words to hurt me. I had to accept that this was done to me, I didn’t cause this to be done to myself. KR & AR are responsible for their own choices, not me! Once again they imply they were “being forced” into doing something!!

Below, you will find one such acts in the “statement of facts” they submitted. They try to imply that the handwritten notes I made on their Notices of Entry” was evidence I “altered” documents and proof that I was lying. They believe that by making the claims that the handwritten notes on the paper look weird that it will be accepted and believed that it is. WOW!!

Once again all I see is “it appears” followed by the personal speculations they are making about what I said or did. Where is the evidence showing their claims made here to be true and factual?

This part of their statements is so convoluted you can see where they were even getting confused!! Talk about twisting the narratives!! The twists and turns they do with words are a very deliberate act!

Fault finding everything you do is part of their abusive pattern. Toxic Tenants would call out the smallest mistake to make everybody else aware of your error, or as a way to make you feel bad.

Every chance they had, they beat their beliefs into the ground, thinking the more they write the words, the more they will be accepted.

Toxic Tenants absolutely hated being criticized for the slightest thing, which is another reason why they criticize you. I was doing my job and enforcing the rules of apartment living and they didn’t like it and this document was them showing their displeasure! They go into great detail about every incident so you know it bothers them!

Toxic people are also control freaks, so fault-finding is part of their way of trying to control you. They’re really quick to point the finger at you as if they’re faultless and flawless. They always claim they are “innocent and do no wrong“.

These Toxic Tenants go on and on about their “mandated rights of 24-hours notice to be given for entry”, complaining that Notice was given at 3:10 pm for the next morning when it is standard for Tenants to work during the day and not get home till after 5:00 pm. What these Tenants wanted was 48 hours’ Notice, to ensure that it is a full 24-hour period from the time the notice was delivered and entry was gained.

That is totally nitpicky but I decided to give them what they wanted, and I was still refused and not allowed to do my job. Then they turn around and blame me for the work not being done when they were the ones who denied me entry.

I did decide to give them 48 hours Notice in August 2017 and they still complained and refused entry, this time because I didn’t have someone with me to do the work right then and there!! I knew it wouldn’t matter how much time I gave them, they would still nit-pick everything I did!! This act proved that to me!

They nit-pick to find flaws in you to make themself feel worthy and it reinforces their sense of entitlement! They will go as far as looking beyond you and finding fault with your family members, your relationships, your job, your salary, your decisions, your goals, your past, your weight, your height, your face, your mental health, and even your physical health. All of these things are noted in this “statement of facts”.

I have a video of KR in the elevator, putting a picture of me up on his phone showing he added a moustache and beard to my face, as he was making fun of the Polycystic Ovary Disease I had that gave me facial hair. That is how far he would go to make me feel bad about myself. They act like children, trying to “one-up” someone else.

Chronic fault finding comes from fear of not being believed, selfishness in trying to get their way, insecurities over what others are thinking about them, wanting to control the words and actions of others, and low emotional intelligence. (Translation: ignorance and arrogance). When you face that type of negativity, it’s your confidence, optimism, and internal happiness that remind them of something they don’t have. They are jealous of you, that’s all.

The fault is not within you or even about you, but what they choose to project onto you. They are giving you their faults, making you out to be the LIAR they are!

The complete document of their “Statement of Facts” they wrote is full of nitpicking and allegations of unfair treatment they feel they were given, not violations of the Human Rights they tried to claim.

Nothing shows their nitpicking better than this sentence, over an “s” being added to the word “key”. Such a small thing to pick at, but it shows what I mean about nitpicking.

Why does Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy on August 30, 2016, after being 2 1/2 hours late, state the word “ keys ”. And 4 days later state “ key ”?

All I see in this document are their complaints that they were being treated like Tenants.

They didn’t deserve “special treatment” like having me knock on their apartment door to hand deliver Notices of Entry, nor was I obligated to “work with them” and “give them some dates so they could pick from those dates”, nor was I obligated to call them as soon as I knew something.

They can voice their opinion that I was doing my job in the worst possible way, their opinions about that didn’t count.

I was NOT obligated to follow all the suggestions they made in this document regarding how I did my job! Of course, everything I did, everything I said, was wrong and they lay it all out in there.

It is funny reading to me now that the emotions are under control and I can laugh at it these days, as they come across as know-it-alls over everything, even what the HRTO should be looking at.

I have become very strong in my own personal beliefs these days. This situation has made me stronger and more determined to live my own life based on my personal needs, not on criticisms and judgements made by someone else who clearly is not involved in my life.

While this situation is now part of my history, the lessons I learned about Toxic traits and the people who show them, will stay with me.

I started over.

---

SEPTEMBER 8, 2017

 ( Referring to Document # 112 ) – The Applicant sends an email at 13:43 that stated “ Hello, Can you please put in my mailbox all the maintenance request forms that I have handed in before your new staff took over. “

 SEPTEMBER 11, 2017

 ( Referring to Document # 113, 114 ) – Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy supplies the Applicant with copies of all her previous Maintenance Request and copies of all Notice of Entry’s given to her since she moved in back in June 2015.

Upon reviewing the supplied documents the Applicant and her husband noted that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy stated on:

( Referring to Document # 113 ) – Notice of Entry dated for August 29, 2016 – “ Tenant ( was ) did not answer door. Either not home + dog was going mad so tech would not enter, Aug. 30/16 – No Keys. ”

 It appears by looking at this altered document that the untruthful words “ No Keys ” is an afterthought and written as a side note after the original not was made.

It also appears to have been written in a different pen, maybe different color as it appears to be a slightly thicker stroke than the pen that was originally used to write the other note.

( Referring to Document # 22, 23, 24 ) – The Human Rights Tribunal also has to begin to wonder why it is in Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy August 30, 2016 email stated “ Also, I was at your door this morning with Pest Control but there was no answer and the technician refused to enter as your dog was growling and barking, so your apartment was not treated. ”

 ( Referring to Document # 22, 23, 24, 114

 Let us quickly compare 2 statements/notes made by Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy, from different sources, the same incident against each other.

It is very interesting that the same Notice of Entry that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy used to make her hand written notes on, and referred to when creating her emails, texts and letter to the Applicant over the next 2 days has no mention of having “ No Keys ”.

With so many opportunities for Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy to bring up this issue, she makes absolutely no reference or mentions having “ No Keys ” for the Applicants unit.

( Referring to Document # 19 ) – Stella Reddy to Applicant Email – August 29, 2016/15:01

( Referring to Document # 20 ) – Stella Reddy to Applicant Text – August 29, 2016/15:29

( Referring to Document # 22, 23, 24 ) – Stella Reddy to Applicant 2 page letter – August 30, 2016

( Referring to Document # 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ) – Stella Reddy to Applicant 5 page email – August 31, 2016/14:45

( Referring to Document # 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ) – The Applicant would like to quickly draw the attention of the Human Rights Tribunal to the August 31, 2016 email.

In the email Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella stated,

• “ we scheduled Terminix Pest Control to treat your apartment ”
• “ entry was not gained due to dog at the door barking and growling ”
• “ there was no answer ”
• “ We will require safe access for this treatment to be completed ”

 “ As per 24 Hour Notice given August 22, 2016 we scheduled Terminix Pest Control to treat your apartment for cockroaches ( August 29, 2016 ) as part of a block, but entry was not gained due to dog at the door barking and growling and there was no answer. A signed form was returned by you that you would be prepared and Notice of Entry asked that all pets be secured, but was not. As a result treatment was not completed and this interferes with your neighbor’s interests, as well as the Landlords, to control these cockroaches in these apartments. We will require safe access for this treatment to be completed. ”

 What is amazing is that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy even address the issue of needing to get into the Applicants unit, “ We will require safe access for this treatment to be completed ”

 How did Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy expect to get “ safe access ” into the Applicants unit if she had  “ No Keys ”? It appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy is more worried about getting “ safe access ” than getting in because according to her own hand written notes, she has “ No keys ”!

 It makes absolutely no sense why Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy is worrying about access, it only makes sense if you intended and are able to get in.

So obviously with that said, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy had to have the key for the Applicants unit for this statement to make logical sense.

( Referring to Document # 113 ) – Another interesting fact that cannot be disputed and is very hard to believe. Is that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy, using her hand written notes as a reference, does not mention or make a reference to having “ No Keys ” in the 1st illegal N5 she gave to the Applicant 3 days later.

• ( Referring to Document # 38, 39, 40 ) – Stella Reddy 3 page N5 to Applicant – August 31, 2016

“ As per 24 Hour Notice given August 22, 2016 we scheduled Terminix Pest Control to treat your apartment for cockroaches ( August 29, 2016 ) as part of a block, but entry was not gained due to dog at the door barking and growling and there was no answer. A signed form was returned by you that you would be prepared and Notice of Entry asked that all pets be secured, but was not. As a result treatment was not completed and this interferes with your neighbor’s interests, as well as the Landlords, to control these cockroaches in these apartments. We will require safe access for this treatment to be completed. ”

 It appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy thinks it is far more important to talk everything else, but the “ No Keys ” issue in all of these documents.

One would think that as the superintend of the building, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy would have express her concerns for the missing key and access, first and foremost in all of her communications with the Applicant. Instead she makes absolutely no mention of it. Why?

• Could it be that the hand written statement “ No Keys ” on Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy’s Notice of Entry to the Applicant did not exist at the time of her writing her email to the Applicant the following day?
• Could it be that the hand written statement “ No Keys ” was a suspicious and continent afterthought by Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy in an attempt to try and create some form of legal documentation that she thought would help prove her innocents after being accused of throwing away the Applicants keys on August 25, 2017?
• Could it be that the hand written statement “ No Keys ” was totally missed by Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy while she was writing her email to the Applicant the following day?
• Could it be that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy considered the statement of “ No Keys ” as being only important enough to note of her copy of the Notice of Entry, but it was irrelevant and unnecessary to address it when corresponding with the Applicant over the following 3 days?

( Referring to Document # 114 ) – Now the Human Rights Tribunal needs to focus on Notice of Entry dated for September 2, 2016 – “ No one home, Did not contain dog. We have no key “

 Unlike the August 29, 2916 hand written notes from the Notice of Entry, It certainly appears that everything in the note was written at the same time.

• No one home
• Did not contain dog
• We have no key

It also appears that it was all written with the same pen, and everything seems to flow constantly. No side notes or after thoughts.

There is only one HUGE problem for Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy with this Notice of Entry date September 2, 2016!

There can be no doubt, argument or debate as to when this was not written, and therefore it can be concluded when it was.

• You see the Human Rights Tribunal needs to remember that on September 2, 2016 a pest control technician and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy did attend the Applicants
• The pest control technician did enter the unit and sprayed while Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy waited in the
• And as a quick reminder, the pest control technician left and complemented the Applicant husband on the great job he had done to try and control the roach
• Let us also remember that is when Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy suddenly became a roach powder expert and tried to bait the Applicants husband into so heated debate about the use of too much

So you see, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy hand written statement “ No one home, Did not contain dog. We have no key ” is no obviously a lie and a conspiracy to create false documentation in an attempt to have the Applicant and family removed from the building.

Now there is a chance that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy might be so foolish as to say that this appointment never happened. Well there are a few ways to verify the existence of this appointment.

1. The Human Rights Tribunal can look at Alto Properties Inc. tax returns for expenses for the
2. The Human Rights Tribunal could ask to see their company check book/log.
3. The Human Rights Tribunal could ask to see their banks statements, looking for any checks cashed around that time. Than request that Alto Properties Inc. request a copy of the checks from the

Or the Human Rights Tribunal can consider the following.

If it was that the appointment never happened. That would have meant that the Applicant would have had to cancel it. Now let us all consider that idea for a minute.

Does the Human Rights Tribunal believe that the Applicant could have cancelled this 2nd appointment for pest control to come in and spray in a 4 day period, and Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy never issued her another N5?

Does the Human Rights Tribunal believe that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy would have allowed this opportunity to pass and not giving the Applicant another N5 for missing a scheduled pest control appoint within a 4 day period?

Let us remember that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy gave the Applicant a N5, 4 days earlier, despite knowing that the Applicant was well with in her rights not to allow her entry as the Applicant was NEVER GIVE THE REQUIRED 24 HOURS PROPER NOTICE as mandated by the Ontario Residential Tenancies Act.

Let us all remember that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy had to of known that she did not meet the required 24 notice, and yet she still gave the Applicant the N5 without fear of any repercussions.

With this information above, does anyone still realistically really believe that the scheduled pest control appointment never happened and suddenly Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy had a change of heart and did not serve them a legitimate N5?

As a side note, it is important to review one more situation from the 2 Notice of Entry’s.

( Referring to Document # 113, 114 ) The Applicant and her husband and were confused by what Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy meant when she stated

• “ No keys ”
• “We have no key ”
• Why does Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy on August 30, 2016, after being 2 1/2 hours late, state the word “ keys ”. And 4 days later state “ key ”?

At the time and to this present date, the Applicant has had only 1 lock on her unit door. The one that came with the unit. The Applicant has not added and second lock and yet Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy thinks there were two, despite standing in front of the door only minutes earlier with the pest control technician before making her hand written notes? Maybe Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy did not go to the right door and went to a different unit to spray?

But four days later Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy suddenly notes that the Applicant inly has 1 lock on her unit door. This is the same day that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy hand written notes state that the appointment never happened.

So why the difference is accounts for the amount of locks on the Applicants unit door?

It can only be assumed that when the Applicant called out Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy about throwing away her key from the office lockbox. Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy panicked and decided that she needed some form of documentation to support her when she states there was never a key to be thrown away.

So Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy grabbed known date where she knew the appointment had not taken placed, August 30, 2016. And made the quick little side note “ No Keys ”.

 At the time Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy did not consider or pounder what she was writing. She basically reacted to being called out by the Applicant without thinking.

Sometime after that, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy decided that it might look better is she had a 2nd document that collaborated the 1st . Hence the September 2, 2016 Notice of Entry with the hand written note “ No one home, Did not contain dog. We have no key. ”

 No it appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy did not catch her first mistake when she stated the words “ keys ” and then used the word “ key ” during her attempts to create her fabricated and deceptive documents.

Again it appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy reacted to being called out by the Applicant without thinking. And in her moment of distress, Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy never realized that she actually did attend the Applicants unit on September 2, 2016 with a pest control technician and the work was done.

Now this evidence only proves the Applicants claims that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy created these two fabricated and deceptive hand written notes about missing key(s) on or after August 25, 2017, that she intended to present to the Landlord Tenant Board on September 26, 2017 if question about her conduct in harassing the Applicant in wanting to change the Applicants lock.

So again it appears that Alto Properties Inc. employee Stella Reddy had deliberately made false statements on a legal document that she used or intended to use to have the Applicant and her family removed from the building.