StellaReddy.com: My Perspective
March 25, 2023
My personal perspectives over this Smear Campaign in my name do change from time to time, thankfully, as I heal from it. I will always heal, as I make a point to do so. I read, get counselling, and I connect with other people who have experienced similar issues with Toxic Adult Bullies, not just these ones.
There are way too many people out there who feel entitled to degrade others for one reason or another all over the internet. Anonymity seems to give them free license to write whatever they want about other individuals but society is catching on. In time, I expect that websites like theirs will no longer be allowed.
I no longer feel any discomfort over having my own website, it is my Story to tell of how I was abused by Toxic Adult Tenants while performing the responsibilities of my job I had there. I don’t share their names anymore, as it is not about them as individuals, but their words and actions that show the Toxic Traits that I was subjected to over the past few years. They don’t know me as they claim, how could they when they were just Tenants to me?
I wrote the below on April 26, 2021, just after my website came online and it shows my confusion still over their actions. I am not confused anymore, as I know they do these things very deliberately.
I have managed to find peace and contentment once again after all this. I still get angry at times over their many lies but I recover a lot faster. I am healing and am determined to release all of the Trauma their actions with websites have caused.
It was very frustrating to see these Toxic Tenants not being held accountable for their domains, and to see Domain providers allow them to steal my personal name for the titles of some of their sites, but I have since released all of that as I know they do suffer. Their lives are miserable by the look of content in their new domains and looking for new people to blame.
In posting their domains online anonymously, they are showing their readers they can’t be trusted. They are sharing personal information about other individuals that is not their right to share in this manner, just as they did with me and others in other domains.
They are building very bad reputations as Adult Bullies who are willing to do whatever it takes to get people fired from their job and terrorized for what they perceive was done to them. They show no facts, just assumptions they have.
They base all their allegations on their “personal assumptions” and “feelings” they have and never on facts they can prove. They have nothing to validate their allegations, or they would have stayed with their HRTO applications against me.
Going by their past history, I assume that their new applications will also be based on “general allegations of unfair treatment” not any violations of their Human Rights. They think that accusing someone of being a liar, proves that they are racist.
I take the fact that they walked away as a BIG WIN for me! All the applications with Human Rights Tribunal that they filed, and then ignored, are all a BIG WIN for anyone who comes after! Every dismissed application there in their names is a benefit.
The list below is just the abandoned applications they filed against other individuals with the SJTO and shows their history. They are publicly shared on Canlii.org for anyone to read.
<https://canlii.ca/t/jl27d> ; <https://canlii.ca/t/j45x5> ; <https://canlii.ca/t/j48qx> ; <https://canlii.ca/t/j47rt> ; <https://canlii.ca/t/jw2ch> ; <https://canlii.ca/t/j49hh> ; <https://canlii.ca/t/j45x6> ; <https://canlii.ca/t/j4852> ; <https://canlii.ca/t/j47s1>
As Vextacious Litigants, they will have to prove their allegations before SJTO will accept any applications from them, as they wasted too much of their time already on frivolous applications. All their applications are brought out to shame, embarrass, and humiliate their targets, no different than the many websites they own. As a result of this, their applications will be seen as frivolous and not proceed.
It will all disappear in time…I am confident in that… Nothing lasts forever!!
Vexatious litigants are generally individuals who harass others by filing frivolous lawsuits. Ontario law, much like the law in other jurisdictions, has recognized that some people interact with the legal system so much and in such an unmanageable manner that their access to the system must be restricted.
1. Proceedings are vexatious if they are instituted with the intention of annoying or embarrassing the person against whom they are brought.
40 (1) Where a judge of the Superior Court of Justice is satisfied, on application, that a person has persistently and without reasonable grounds,
(a) instituted vexatious proceedings in any court; or
(b) conducted a proceeding in any court in a vexatious manner,
the judge may order that,
(c) no further proceeding be instituted by the person in any court; or
(d) a proceeding previously instituted by the person in any court not be continued,
except by leave of a judge of the Superior Court of Justice.
‘Vexatious’ is not defined in the Courts of Justice Act, however, the definition of the term in a legal context according to the Oxford English Dictionary is “denoting an action or the bringer of an action that is brought without sufficient grounds for winning, purely to cause annoyance to the defendant”. When a court finds that a lawsuit fits the meaning of vexatious, the court is permitted to dismiss the matter.
The court found that the employee had a pattern of repeated litigation, and of not accepting the outcome whenever it did not go in her favour.
We will do whatever it takes to not only to expose and destroy their lies and racist behavior by making these individuals accountable. But to make sure they understand and they know it was our family that did it!
Let the cards start falling where they may!
This all occurred at 859 Kennedy Road Scarborough ON in a property owned and managed by private landlords, Alto Properties Inc. It is a small building and I loved living and working there until Toxic Tenants started questioning every little thing I did in my job. This situation became a nightmare that was hard for me to wake up from, but thankfully, I did!
I am grateful for the education I received on Toxic behaviours from so many others who came before me including my counsellors and doctors. It is in therapy that I learned how to combat the severe gaslighting and word salads they did in trying to confuse the issue.
Every way they could degrade me as a person, they did it. You will see within these pages all the nasty malicious things they did to me. It was attempts to invalidate me as a human being who has rights of my own.
I was terrorized, in the beginning, but once the legal decisions were released, and people could see the truth for themselves, it stopped. I also woke up to what was going on…
These Tenants wanted revenge for their eviction, plain and simple!
I have no reason to “react” to their written content these days. I don’t want this site to be another angry one filled with my defence, as there really is no need for it. The past is done, gone and over. Nothing else can be done about that situation…
There is not one thing that these Toxic Tenants can do to me anymore, the truth of their lies has been exposed. I have nothing to defend myself over, never did. All I can do now is work out this Smear Campaign in my own head and let it go. This is what this site is for. Share my Story and how I made it through and hopefully I share enough for the next Target of these Bullies to reconize their many toxic traits.
Who really cares if Toxic Tenants think Stella Reddy is a “phony and outright liar”? He is entitled to his opinions and I could care less what he thinks. It has no bearing on my life.
There is no need even for Toxic Tenants to keep going, as nothing he says or does now will ever change the outcome, as they still lost and were evicted.
They are just individuals bashing others online out of a personal vendetta. It is Cyberbullying and a Smear Campaign instigated by Narcissists.
Toxic Tenants claims voilations of their Human Rights, their opinions about me being “phony and outright liar” has nothing to do with that and don’t count. It is the evidence that I was being racist and discrimatory towards them that they had to prove.
You will see Toxic Tenant’s own words that instigated the reactions he shows online, as he only shows the result of his Bullying way towards me, not what he did or said that got that reaction.
I share everything so you can see why I believe what I do and so you can make up your own mind, if you so choose. Either way, I have every right to share my personal Story and write from my own perspective.
My experience with meeting new people in the past months in Newfoundland has taught me that no one truly cares what Toxic Tenants have to say about me. No one goes home and does a search for “stella reddy” and is influenced by these words online by an anonymous Administrator…I came to my senses…
Even if Toxic Tenants did have his name there, it wouldn’t make a difference. He is of no importance to my life, so his opinions don’t count, no matter what he implies in his content. Toxic Tenants have no power over my life and how I live it. They will forever remain faceless, nameless, Tenants to me who wanted revenge for their eviction.
Why would anyone take the written words of an anonymous stranger online, about anyone they write about or any given situation?
The few who have read any of their content on stellareddy.com tell me they feel for my situation and can tell this anonymous person is “out to get me“. The wording on their domain’s content gives it away… It is just nasty vitriol! You end up feeling “dirty” like you came into contact with something vile. The angst these words give you is not pleasant so I can understand why people don’t want to read any of it.
Right off the first page, you can tell it is about Stella Reddy, not by Stella Reddy.
“This site was created as an information sharing site to alert the public as to the anti-black and racist behavior “. “
“So with that said, Happy Anniversary, Stella Reddy; we have many, many more years together in this journey to expose your racist behavior to as many individuals as we can. Because remember, racist people like you need to be “called out.””
It’s been a vicious cycle…
Narcissists also like to truncate the story and present only a bit where the aggrieved party reacted to their toxic behaviour, such as the quotes and most of the pages on this domain, framing it as if that’s where the story started.
Or they twist it by using euphemisms and deceiving language. Toxic Tenants sends me an email on March 1, 2021, and when I “react” by making a free website on WIX, he gets it taken down for the PII within it, but turns around and makes a page talking about it, but did not mention the email he sent, did he? Of course not. https://stellareddy.com/lol-stella-reddys-website-is-disabled-and-removed-by-wix/
If a narcissist dislikes you and tries to bully you but you stand up for yourself, they will frame it as if they are the ones being a victim of bullying. In their narrative, they were just doing their thing and you started being mean to them. Meanwhile, they simply left out what happened beforehand when they bullied you, so actually your “being mean” to them is a normal response to toxic behaviour.
By leaving out or downplaying their aggression they simply frame you engaging in self-defence, as vile aggression against them. It is vilification at its worst!
When you look at the bare facts of this situation from the beginning, you can clearly see where it was instigated. My Bullies were trying to make it personal about them when it was professional. I was doing my job, the same one I did for 16 years by this point, just like millions of other people do every day, dealing with Tenants who break the rules of apartment living.
To me, all tenants were nameless and faceless as I truly didn’t care who they were or even what they looked like, they were just apartment numbers. You see, I was hired for the apartment and property as a whole, not the people living within it. They were tenants to be tolerated until they moved out and more moved in. As long as they followed the rules, why would I care about anything else? I had enough to worry about, as it is a stressful job.
I would also like to know what was so special about these tenants that they would even think I would go against all my training, even my own integrity, to “target” for eviction and lie and cheat to get that result when I never did it before. I worked in the Property Management Industry for 18 years when I quit and never had such issues before from anyone until these Tenants, KR & AR. That fact alone tells you something, doesn’t it?
I am sorry, but I don’t see anything special about these Toxic Tenants that would cause anyone to go against their own integrity to “target” for anything, as truly, they are not worth the hassle! I knew they were Bullies the first time I met them, when they pressured me into taking their cash rental payment, and tried again the following month.
I came to accept that no one will believe their narratives about me, as truly, they just do not know.
Apartment rentals have rules that need to be followed, just like any industry, and called the Residential Tenancies Act.
The Residential Tenancies Act of Ontario is very specific about what you can and cannot do in a rental and questioning, let alone outright, refusing access for repairs and inspections is one of them that is not allowed. These Bullies continually kept refusing access and this is why they were evicted.
- My Bullies were mad over not being able to pay in cash, and it shows.
- They were mad over the propane BBQs, and it shows.
- They were mad over the parking, and it shows.
- They were mad over every aspect of how I did my job there and every decision I ever made there, and it shows.
They question every aspect of how I did my job, from notices to procedures. Then turn around and make the claim that they “began to feel that Stella Reddy was trying to intimidate and threaten them into compliance”.
Personal feelings that they have, are not facts. Just because they believe everyone is lying, don’t make it true. Just because they claim so many people are being racist towards them, don’t make it true. Making any statements that they can’t back up with actual evidence, do not matter.
Toxic Tenants refuse to accept that their personal feelings, are not evidence. I don’t care what they “began to feel” was going on and it isn’t my problem they refused to accept anything I say about my own reactions. That is their choice, but no one will accpt any of their “feelings” as facts.
The words ‘it appears”, and “it seems” are all throughout their content which you know is not facts and followed by their own opinions and many assumptions.. They have shown no evidence, just their speculations and what they “feel” is going on.
I share below some copied and pasted info from their own domain, where they lay out their perspectives over these first encounters and you can clearly see their brains turning “At that very moment the interracial married couple/tenants began to feel that Stella Reddy was trying to intimidate and threaten them into compliance with being okay with what she wanted.”
It is pure projection! All of their actions have always been based on their own personal feelings, not on facts they could prove.
They never care about what anyone else has to say, they only care about their own perspectives. They claim I did it, so as far as they are concerned that is the end of it.
They resented me for the changes I was trying to make that they didn’t agree with, such as the cash payment and removal of propane BBQs, that they projected this resentment onto me, trying to make it sound like I was out to get them personally, not just doing my job.
With the very first notice I sent out to Tenants informing them that cash payments for rent will no longer be accepted on July 5, 2016, Toxic Tenants deliberately ignored it. She shows, in her own words, how she ignored the request from building staff, not once, but twice, on July 5 and August 1, 2016.
If a person ignores change to procedures for any company, what does that action say about this person? To me, it tells me they have no respect.
When Toxic Tenants ignored this request of no cash, no matter the reason it was asked for, this action told me that she didn’t care about anyone else’s position, only her own. They verified this by their comments on August 1, 2016, that she didn’t care if I was comfortable with taking the cash or not. Toxic Tenants didn’t care that she Bullied me into taking her cash payments and caused such a ruckus that we went out of our way to set up interact payments for them.
This behaviour, right from the beginning, told me all I needed to know about them, not only as tenants who will question every procedure but also as people. They shown themselves to be Bullies.
The next issue was the BBQ and Toxic Tenants lays that out so very clearly in his own domain. https://stellareddy.com/stella-reddy-luigi-liscio-anthony-liscio-and-a-barbecue/
Toxic Tenants didn’t think there was anything wrong with printing out documents and taking them to the office to try and prove Stella Reddy wrong about the rules. That’s all that was, Toxic Tenants showing his superiority over Stella Reddy and trying to get her to back off from making the change. Once again, Toxic Tenants was attempting to Bully Stella Reddy into compliance with his wishes.
What purpose was behind this action of printing out documents and taking them to the office, if not to try and influence the end result? Would you take printed-out documents to any other company and tell them they are misrepresenting the rules?
Yes, right from the beginning my Bullies were aggressive and constant with their criticisms over every change I was making in procedures. You can see it on their own website of https://socialjusticetribunalsontario.ca/timeline-of-facts-and-events-1/ where they lay out their perspectives.
In the end, it wasn’t the Toxic Tenant’s place to question how the procedures of any apartment rental office. They had no say in how the building was managed, they were not even owners of the unit they lived in, so had no right to question anything.
It is a Smear Campaign!
JULY 5, 2016
The next time the female from the interracial married couple / tenants encountered Stella Reddy was on July 5, 2016 when she refused to take $121.00 cash from the female from the interracial married couple / tenants for the remaining amount owed on the July rent.
The female from the interracial married couple / tenants explained to Stella Reddy that she did not care if she was “comfortable” with the idea or not.
Eventually Stella Reddy had to give in and took the $121 cash payment as she was unable to find any justifiable reason why previous Angie could take cash, but she ( Stella Reddy ) now could not?
At that time Stella Reddy stated that the interracial married couple / tenants was “either going to have to write checks or get money orders made in the future to pay your rent, starting next month. ( August 2016 )”
JULY 28, 2016
( Exhibit # 7 ) – The interracial married couple / tenants find a letter in their mailbox by Stella Reddy stating in a threatening and bully manner that their BBQ is “not allowed under City of Toronto Fire Code regulations, as they require BBQ’s to be at least 9 feet away from doors and windows.”
( Exhibit # 8, 9, 10 ) – The male from the interracial married couple / tenants went to the unit and grabbed some documents that he had previously prepared to give to Alto Properties Inc. property manager Stella Reddy in regards to the BBQ letter that was previous left in their mailbox dated July 28, 2016.
The male from the interracial married couple / tenants went to the office and handed Stella Reddy the printed pages from the City of Toronto website in regards to what where the actual facts about the “Use of BBQ on a balcony.” The male from the interracial married couple / tenants stated “I think you have misread the act in regards to BBQ’s and balconies”
The male from the interracial married couple / tenants also supplied Stella Reddy with a copy of the TSSA ( Technical Standards & Safety Authority ) 2 page requirements print from their website that stated “Using propane BBQ’s on the balcony? You may be one of many Ontarians who live in an apartment or condominium – but are you aware of the safety issues and restrictions involved when using barbecues on balconies?, If barbecues are permitted in your building, there are still some regulations you need to be aware of.
Stella Reddy quickly reviewed the documents for approximately about 10 seconds when the male from the interracial married couple / tenants stated “A window and a door is not considered to be a building intake.”
Stella Reddy indignantly replied “all propane tanks have to be 9 feet away from any opening, and therefore they do not meet fire code requirements set by the city of Toronto.”
The male from the interracial married couple / tenants stated “What you are doing is taking some of one part and adding some of another part and making up your own rules.”
Stella Reddy abruptly cut the male from the interracial married couple / tenants off and stated in a bully tone “In my 20 plus years as a superintendent, I have had to research this as I have seen MANY propane tanks exploded.”
Stella Reddy continued “in my last building, before I got ill with Cancer, there was a barbecue area right next to the building. One day a propane tank suddenly exploded right next to a gentleman who was barbecuing and it caused the building to catch on fire causing a huge amount of damage.”
NOTE: Searching the internet and speaking with Property Management at 3969 Kingston Rd, Scarborough, Ontario. There is no record of there ever being a propane tank explosion or anyone being hurt at Alto Properties Inc. property manager Stella Reddy previous place of employment as she claimed.
The male from the interracial married couple / tenants replied “WOW, I have never heard of any propane tanks exploding on news here in Toronto, let alone causing a building to go up into flames.” He then stood there for a few seconds just looking at Stella Reddy thinking how she was a phony and an outright liar.
The male from the interracial married couple / tenants stated “interesting” and then turned around and walk out of the office, amazed about how Alto Properties Inc. property manager Stella Reddy was willing to make herself look like a bold face liar just to try and prove her inaccurate point.
Later that same afternoon, the interracial married couple / tenants went to the office to pay $121 in cash for her remaining rent for the month of August 2016 as done every month since moving in 13 months earlier.
The male from the interracial married couple / tenants went into the office with his phone video recording the interaction, as they anticipated that again Stella Reddy would again try to refuse her cash for rent and wanted proof of the refusal.
The female from the interracial married couple / tenants attempted to hand Stella Reddy the $121 cash, but she refused to take it for that month’s rent.
Stella Reddy again stated that she was “not comfortable” with taking the cash.
The female from the interracial married couple / tenants replied that she again did not care if Stella Reddy was uncomfortable with the idea of her paying her remaining rent in cash, and that it was not her problem.
The female from the interracial married couple / tenants stated to Stella Reddy “that if you are going to be a superintendent of a building you need to be comfortable with handling cash.”
Stella Reddy replied that the interracial married couple / tenants were “either going to have to write check or get a money order made to pay your rent.”
The female from the interracial married couple / tenants stated that she was “not going to go buy checks for $67.00, and I am not going to spend $11.30 every month to make money orders because you ( Stella Reddy ) are not comfortable handling cash.”
Stella Ready suddenly changing her position and argument from being “not comfortable” to now Alto Properties Inc. owner Luigi Liscio says “it is a liability issue and the owners NEVER wanted it.” And “that because there is no safe in the office, I cannot take cash.”
The female from the interracial married couple / tenants asked “Did Angie and Chris take Alto Properties safe to their apartment when they were fired?”
Stella Reddy replied “There was never a safe.”
So the female from the interracial married couple / tenants asked “How did they manage to protect the money I gave them, and you can’t?” and “What change in this situation that did not exist before that suddenly Louie now thinks it is a liability issue?”
Stella Reddy ignored the questions completely and stated “according to your lease, all rent must be paid by check or money order, and if you decide not to pay using one of these two methods, than I will be forced to evict you for not paying your rent.”
At that very moment the interracial married couple / tenants began to feel that Stella Reddy was trying to intimidate and threaten them into compliance with being okay with what she wanted.
The female from the interracial married couple / tenants began to remember how the last time she was in the same office with Alto Properties Inc. employees Angie and Chris, when they also tried to ambush, intimidate and threaten her into compliance with an eviction because she was not okay with their idea of allowing people to enter her unit illegally and without proper notice.
But now it was Stella Reddy who was trying to intimidate and threaten interracial married couple / tenants into compliance with an eviction for questioning her on how they were suppose to pay her rent.
The male from the interracial married couple / tenants stated to his wife “if that is the case, than we will hold onto our rent and eventually Louie ( Luigi Liscio ) will have to take us to court, and at that time, he can explain to the Landlord Tenant Board why he is now suddenly refusing to take our money for the rent after 13 months of taking it.”
Stella Reddy replied ” I am very familiar with the Ontario Residential Tenancies Act because I have been a superintendent for 16 years here in Canada, and Alto Properties can implement whatever new polices they want and whenever they feel the need to do so, because The Act allows for it.”
The male from the interracial married couple / tenants quickly jumped on Stella Reddy statement stating “You said earlier to me you’ve been a superintendent for 20 years, now its 16?”
Stella Reddy got very defensive and replied “No, I told you 16 years!”
The female from the interracial married couple / tenants jumped into the conversation to end the debate and stated “Look, Louie cannot just start enforcing his own rules after 13 months on not wanting too, especially when it results in me now having incur an expense to pay my own rent. Louie has chosen to accept my rent for the past 13 months using cash, and now suddenly Louie wants to implement new policies for rent payments? He needs to continue to offer me something that is still free.”
Such demands here hey? Since when is any of this in the Residential Tenancies Act? How is service fees incurred in payment methods the responsibility of the landlord?
After some more conversation between the parties, Stella Reddy finally either realized that she was being video recorded and/or just realized that this was a no win situation and stated “I will speak to the owners ( Antony Liscio ) about doing a onetime e-transfer for your remaining rent.”
Stella Reddy went on to state “at their other properties, they already have in place an e-transfer feature for the tenants to pay their rent there.” The female from the interracial married couple / tenants asked “Why doesn’t Louie just offer it here and then the problem is solved?”
Stella Reddy stated “I am going to bring in an interact machine soon, so you can pay your rent that way.” The female from the interracial married couple / tenants replied “How much is that going to cost?” Stella Reddy replied “Not sure yet?” and that was the end of the conversation.
Stella Reddy stated “I will get back to you tomorrow about the e-transfer.” and the female from the interracial married couple / tenants replied “ Okay, thanks.” and the interracial married couple / tenants left the office and went back to their unit.