I wanted to share with you the clarity I now have over this domain and its contents.  http://sjtomemberkevinlundy.com/chapter-1-part-d/

These Adult Tenant Bullies clearly claim it was this man job to intervene in a legal process he is presiding over and give legal advice to any party before him. It is not.

It is not this persons job to attempted to correct or instructed anyone on any laws or actions, during any proceeding before them. 

I accept the reason why I got so upset over seeing these words online within a domain owned and managed by Adult Tenant Bullies. I got upset over the fact that they take their personal interpretations and act like it is the only correct one. They write as if what they think that someone is doing, is the absolute truth. It is the labels placed before each name, the motivations they claim they know for sure that this person has. It is the arrogance within their writing that rubs me the wrong way. They write as if their words are the only possible truth and have no consideration that they could be wrong. 

Everything in this domain, is pure speculation and personal interpretation of the writers, based on his own skewed views. Divisional Court of Appeal, which took 18 months to get a hearing for, deemed there was no such actions as claimed within this site, there was no bias shown. Of course, because of that outcome, the people working at this Court also was added to the list of people “out to get them” because they didn’t agree with their claims. The Divisional Court decision also stated there was no racism. 

All this domain was ever about is placing blame on everyone else, not accepting any accountability for their own actions. Nowhere in this domains content will you ever see them write about how they stood there in court and stated no one was getting in. No where will you see them talk about all the times they refused access, and why they did it. It is all about placing blame, when they are grown ass adult responsible for themselves. If they felt their rights were not being respected, it was THEIR job to speak up and prove it, or have a lawyer present to do it for them.

All the below, was this man’s job. He is required to “sit idly by and not voice any concern” as speaking up would cause him to not be neutral in his job. They are not allowed to voice any concerns, give legal advice, laws, or defend any person before him during any proceedings.

What is the sense in complaining over a neutral party, whose job it is to sit idly by and listen to everything he hears and make a order based on the laws of the RTA? 

This man is not obligated to these people, he has no obligation to intervene in a proceeding and speak up on their behalf, over anything. Kory Read didn’t hire Kevin Lundy to speak for him, so why do he think he was obligated to do so?

As it states, it was Kory Read’s job to present his case, and if he didn’t have the knowledge to do so, he should have had a lawyer there to do it for him. He didn’t even speak to Duty Counsel to see what could happen, he expected the judge to protect him and intervene on his behalf instead?  That is very unrealistic and not this adjudicators job to do.

The adjudicator did his job, he sat idly by and took in the proceedings, and looked at the evidence submitted showing their persistent refusals of access, in their own words, and listened to Kory Read state these same words in court. They were evicted for that.

I have written about their allegations numerous time against me and I have never denied getting upset upon hearing the detailed lies about some fictitious prior meeting at some restaurant they claim we had. I acknowledge what I said was inappropriate and I have had counselling for it as well.

I came to accept and understand that yes, what I said was inappropriate, but I didn’t know it at the time and I was very upset. As Kevin Lundy stated in the order, he believed I was “oblivious” in my outburst, as he saw how upset I was, and I was very incoherent. The words I said, didn’t even make sense!

Remember, I have the audio recording of this proceedings and it is online as well. https://stellareddy.xyz/kory-read-projecting-obsessions/

I do believe that Kory Read wants to condemn me for life for my outburst in this hearing that was held 5 years ago. This person is so inflexible, he cannot accept that people make mistakes out of anger and frustration as result of the many lies they tell. Kory Read prefers to hold grudges against people for being human, even 5 years later.  

Kory Read prefers to take my one lone outburst and use it to make the claim that I am a racist person. He don’t have anything else, not before this hearing nor after, to use in his lies of me on racism. Just this and he has been playing it up for the past 5 years.

Kory Read loves to play the victim in his narratives and he will keep going, as he will never get the resolution he wants. One instance of me being inappropriate, do not make me a racist, no matter how they try to embellish it! 

I am very confident in myself these days and I know who I am. Kory Read do not.

 

https://tribunalsontario.ca/en/members/Appointees

---

Role of the Appointee

Appointees (adjudicators) at Tribunals Ontario hold hearings, make rulings, review and analyze evidence and make decisions. Because the adjudicator is neutral, they cannot provide legal advice or tell you how to present your case. It is up to you to present evidence that supports your position. The adjudicator may ask questions during the hearing. When the hearing is over, the adjudicator might tell you their decision right away or they might “reserve” the decision, which means they will take more time to consider your evidence and submissions. In either case, you will receive the decision in writing. This decision is sometimes called an order.

Chapter 1 – Part A

DELIBERATE IGNORANCE

The racist Caucasian Social Justice Tribunal of Ontario ( SJTO ) member Kevin Lundy maliciously and intentionally enabled and authorized the Caucasians Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio to engage in racist, prejudice, discriminatory behavior and victimization of the interracial married couple / tenants during a Landlord Tenant Board ( LTB ) hearing in front of him on September 26, 2017 by knowingly allowing the Caucasian Applicants to…

• physically point at and use the female of the interracial married couple / tenants as a black prop during the public hearing while using a racist slur and colorism to describe and compare the Respondents complexion to Stella Reddy’s nephew, stating

“ My Nephew is as black as you can get. ( then while pointing at the Respondent ) He’s even darker than  she is! “

• again label the interracial married couple / tenants two bi–racial children, who were present with the racist slur “ Mulatto ” which is used to refer to individuals born of one white parent and one black parent. The term is considered to be derogatory and offensive and stems from the times of slavery.
• use the offensive, derogatory and prejudice word “ Newfie ”on different occasion throughout the public hearing as unwanted harassment.
• portray the female of the interracial married couple / tenants as a stereotypical, ill–mannered, ill–tempered, loud, aggressive, demanding and uncivilized Angry Black Woman ( Sapphire ).
• verbally insult, humiliate, disrespect, embarrass, degrade and harass the interracial married couple / tenants with their racist, prejudice, discriminatory behavior and victimization of the interracial married couple / tenants, they became increasingly frustrated with the system and distracted by the Caucasian Applicants intolerable and unacceptable behavior during the public hearing, which resulted in the interracial married couple / tenants not being able to present their defense / case properly.

And all this was done under the watchful eye and presence of the racist SJTO member Kevin Lundy. While the Caucasians Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio to present their continuous assertions that Stella Reddy was not racist and a discriminatory bigot in a public forum.

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy maliciously and intentionally never attempted to correct or instructed the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio or his son Anthony Liscio to suspend their use of racial slurs, racist actions, derogatory behavior, prejudice language and victimization of the interracial married couple / tenants at any time during the public hearing in front of him.

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy never attempted to direct the Caucasians Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio to act in the appropriate fashion that is mandated under the Tribunals Ontario Social Justice – Common Rules to always be courteous and respectful of the tribunal and other participants in the proceeding.

• Tribunals Ontario Social Justice – Common Rules – A7 Courtesy and Respect – A7.1 – All persons participating in proceedings before or communicating with the tribunal must act in good faith and in a manner that is courteous and respectful of the tribunal and other participants in the proceeding.

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy never attempted to instruct the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio to suspend their use of racial slurs, racist actions, derogatory and prejudice language and victimization of the interracial married couple / tenants at any time in front of him because, he was attempting to protect the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio and their racially motivated L2 eviction application against the Respondents.

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy maliciously and intentionally authorized the Caucasians Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio intolerable and unacceptable behavior which undoubtedly violated the interracial married couple / tenants  mandated rights to equal justice, the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice during the public hearing on September 26, 2017.

• Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
• Canadian Bill of Rights – 1. It is hereby recognized and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely, (a) the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;
• Human Rights Code – 1 Every person has a right to equal treatment with respect to services, goods and facilities, without discrimination because of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, marital status, family status or disability.
• Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector – Federal public servants are expected to conduct themselves in accordance with the values of the public sector and these expected behaviours. – Respect for People – Public servants shall respect human dignity and the value of every person by: 2.1 Treating every person with respect and fairness.
• SJTO – Code of Conduct – Fairness – 4. SJTO adjudicators/mediators must treat those who appear before them without discrimination or favoritism.
• SJTO – Code of Conduct – Fairness – 5. SJTO adjudicators/mediators must treat each person with dignity, courtesy and respect and in a manner that builds trust and confidence in SJTO, and the administration of justice.
• Code of Conduct – Fairness – 7. SJTO adjudicators/mediators will be aware and respectful of social, cultural and other differences and act in a manner that promotes an appreciation of diversity.
• SJTO – Offering Assistance – 11. An SJTO staff person or SJTO Member shall not offer assistance to a person or entity dealing with the SJTO other than the assistance given in the ordinary course of their employment.
• Canadian Multiculturalism Act – WHEREAS the Constitution of Canada provides that every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and benefit of the law without discrimination and that everyone has the freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief, opinion, expression, peaceful assembly and association and guarantees those rights and freedoms equally to male and female persons;
• Canadian Multiculturalism Act – AND WHEREAS the Citizenship Act provides that all Canadians, whether by birth or by choice, enjoy equal status, are entitled to the same rights, powers and privileges and are subject to the same obligations, duties and liabilities;

Chapter 1 – Part C

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy maliciously and intentionally authorized the Caucasians Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio intolerable and unacceptable behavior which undoubtedly violated the interracial married couple / tenants mandated rights not to be subject to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment during the public hearing on September 26, 2017.

• Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – 12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
• Canadian Bill of Rights – 2. Every law of Canada shall, unless it is expressly declared by an Act of the Parliament of Canada that it shall operate notwithstanding the Canadian Bill of Rights, be so construed and applied as not to abrogate, abridge or infringe or to authorize the abrogation, abridgment or infringement of any of the rights or freedoms herein recognized and declared, and in particular, no law of Canada shall be construed or applied so as to – (b) impose or authorize the imposition of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment;
• SJTO – Code of Conduct – Quality and Consistency – 11. SJTO adjudicators/mediators will be prepared for proceedings. They will ensure that proceedings are orderly and follow applicable rules and guidelines.
• SJTO – Code of Conduct – Quality and Consistency – 12. SJTO adjudicators/mediators must maintain the integrity of the proceedings.

Chapter 1 – Part D

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy maliciously and intentionally authorized the Caucasians Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio intolerable and unacceptable behavior which undoubtedly violated the interracial married couple / tenants mandated rights to be equal before and under the law and the rights to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination during the public hearing on September 26, 2017.

• Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – 15.1 Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
• Canadian Bill of Rights – 1. It is hereby recognized and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely, (b) the right of the individual to equality before the law and the protection of the law.
• SJTO – Our Mission – SJTO and our constituent tribunals will: provide fair, effective, timely and accessible resolution of legal issues related to the social justice statutes that we administer,
• Our Values – The core values inform how the SJTO and its constituent tribunals approach their mandate. They set the foundation for rules and policies, how those rules and policies will be applied, and how we deliver service to the public. The core values are: Accessibility – We are committed to diversity and inclusiveness.
• SJTO – Conflict of Interest Rules Preferential Treatment – Prohibited Conduct – 9. When performing his or her duties to SJTO and the Crown, an SJTO staff person or SJTO Member shall not give preferential treatment to any person or entity, including a person or entity in which the SJTO staff person or SJTO Member, or a member of his or her family, or any other person with whom they have a close business or personal relationship, has an interest.
• SJTO – Conflict of Interest Rules Preferential Treatment – Prohibited Conduct – 10. When performing his or her duties to SJTO and the Crown, an SJTO staff person or SJTO Member shall not behave in a manner that could create the appearance that preferential treatment is being given to a person or entity.
• Canadian Multiculturalism Act – AND WHEREAS the Canadian Human Rights Act provides that every individual should have an equal opportunity with other individuals to make the life that the individual is able and wishes to have, consistent with the duties and obligations of that individual as a member of society, and, in order to secure that opportunity, establishes the Canadian Human Rights Commission to redress any proscribed discrimination, including discrimination on the basis of race, national or ethnic origin or colour;
• AND WHEREAS Canada is a party to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which Convention recognizes that all human beings are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law against any discrimination and against any incitement to discrimination, and to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Covenant provides that persons belonging to ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities shall not be denied the right to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practice their own religion or to use their own language;
• AND WHEREAS the Government of Canada recognizes the diversity of Canadians as regards race, national or ethnic origin, colour and religion as a fundamental characteristic of Canadian society and is committed to a policy of multiculturalism designed to preserve and enhance the multicultural heritage of Canadians while working to achieve the equality of all Canadians in the economic, social, cultural and political life of Canada;

Chapter 1 – Part E

Instead of the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy performing his obligated duty to enforce the interracial married couple / tenants mandated rights under all the listed earlier Acts, and maintain order and decorum during the public hearing that was in front of him. This was not this person’s job.

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately decided to sit by idly and not voice any concerns or in defense of the interracial married couple / tenants and all their mandated rights afforded to them. 

By the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately and passively sits by idly and ignoring the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio as they engaged in this intolerable and unacceptable behavior against interracial married couple / tenants in a public hearing.

By the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately and passively sitting by idly and ignoring and not enforcing the interracial married couple / tenants mandated rights outlined and afforded to them by the many Acts list earlier.

By the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately and passively sits by idly and ignoring the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio as they engaged in this unacceptable behavior and not enforcing and maintaining order and decorum during the public hearing.

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy acted in the textbook legal definition of Deliberate Ignorance.

Deliberate Ignorance literally means and is defined as; one wilfully and intentionally ignoring a fact(s) when one has every reason to believe about its existence.

By the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately shutting his eyes and ears to the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio racist, prejudice, discriminatory behavior and victimization of the interracial married couple ( tenants ).

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy is actively guilty of partaking and silently authorizing the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio in their racist, prejudice, discriminatory behavior and victimization of the interracial married couple / tenants.

Monahan v. Cook, 2018 HRTO 428

• [15] The fair administration of justice is necessarily dependent on maintaining order and decorum in hearing rooms.  See Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2011] 1 SCR 19, 2011 SCC 2 (CanLII), at para. 69.  Furthermore, an adjudicator cannot simply close his or her eyes and pretend to be limited to what goes on at the witness stand.  Adjudicators have a duty to maintain order and decorum in their hearing rooms.
• [16] – The Tribunal has the power to address, on its own initiative, issues of courtesy and respect in the proceeding or abuse of its processes.  See Rules A4, A7 and A8 of the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Common Rules, and Rule 1.6 of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario Specific Rules.