Adult Tenant Bullies Don’t Act Like Adults, Remember That!

The whole difficulty in dealing with narcissists is to think because they look like adults, and have the intelligence of adults, they will act like adults.

But emotionally and psychologically they are like children. They will never act like an adult.

There’s no need to make this more complicated than it is. They are children, having a temper tantrum over not getting what they want.

 

I have this quote above saved for a long time and is what I use to read every morning to motivate me from taking things so personally that Adult Tenant Bullies were doing. 

As soon as I started thinking of Kory & Allison Read like a couple of spoiled children having a temper tantrum over not getting their way, it became a lot easier for me to not take their words personally, and see the intentions behind them instead. This documents shows their total lack of emptahy towards another human being as well as other traits.

You see, it is human nature to assume that just because I have a conscious, that Bullies attacking you do too, and that was my mistake. I truly thought that they would feel terrible for making false accusations against someone me. I was wrong. They don’t have a conscious nor are they able to have compassion. Their many words I have over the past few years, especially the HRTO applications, show me that. The very fact they made and posted a domain in my own personal name, told me this as well!

If anything, once they knew how badly all their actions online and in the property was affecting me and my mental state, they got way worse, not better! During the HRTO process, they played on  my mental health with their constant blantant statements. They write like they think their speculations on my words and actions is all that counts. That what I say is all lies. The Gaslighting within this document is also very much on display!

This document submitted to HRTO by Kory Read on January 1, 2019 for the Response to all the replies received from myself and the property owners, and it will show you the childish mentality of these Adult Tenant Bullies. I didn’t read all this document till last year; it was too convoluted for me to read at the time and pissed me off too much.

It is confusing and repetitious and very contracdictory to what they already wrote before. It isn’t even finished and at no time do they even write about those domains they had online. They had written so much, I think they got overwhelmed with trying to keep all their lies straight!

In this document, Kory Read claims I am the Narcissist and that I also have OCD and he takes every opportunity to tell you what Stella Reddy is, once again. Nope, I am not allowed to think for myself, Kory Read will do that for me and tell you what my motives are towards them!

#2 is a outright lie as the LTB didn’t see that form. The LTB only saw 2 form N’5 that were issued to these tenants, the one For August 24, 2017 for the bathroom ceiling repairs, and the Form N5 Sept 1, 2017 to change the door lock so we could enter, so the claims that LTB said they were all illegal, is a lie. They can’t make a determination of forms they didn’t see, no one can.

So the mentions below of Form N5’s, given in 2016, being stated by the Member at the LTB as being illegal, were in fact not even seen by the member. They were not included in the application for eviction.

#3, that is funny, trying to claim the owners could have asked them about the letter, yet, in the letter itself, they state they don’t want a response and when the owners did try to set up a meeting in the office to discuss this letter, they refused. So, no, they were not open to discussion, or they would have when asked! Why refuse a meeting when they were so interested in discussing that letter?

So many “past behaviour” as noted below, are personal speculations done by them, as they don’t know. Kory Read is trying so hard to make his applications so confusing… When I did my HRTO request for info, this document wasn’t included with it, so that tells me it wasn’t accepted a part of their file. It don’t surprise me, as there is no clear evidence or proof included with this document, just more of their own personal opinions, not any facts. They refused to address the domains they did, all the time! Totally ignored them being online, tho I did not.

“what was morally right and in good faith.”  would have been Kory & Alison Read acccepting they were evicted by their own actions of refusing entry.  They even admitted to refusing entry and admit they “lit into me when I went to the door”.  The basis of their eviction was based on the actions on August 24, 2017, not anything before nor anything after. They put in so much word salad, to confuse you and repeat, repeat, repeat, for the same reason!

Allison Read submitted a maintenance request August 24, 2017 and I gave them 48 hours notice, 24 hours MORE than required, ON PURPOSE, yet they still denied entry and ” let into me” with name-calling and derogatory language. I showed they refused access DELIBERATELY, and at the hearing in their own words, all because I didn’t have the contractor with me to do the work, and I made them wait around all day, claiming I should have been there at 8 am instead. As for the Sept 1, 2017 N5 Form? Yeah, that I learned was “void” as they didn’t stop the behaviour from the first N5, which was deny entry. I issued that form, as we gave them 7 DAYS notice to change the door lock to eliminate the need for them to be home, and they still refuse.

That refusal from August 24, 2017 was enough to get them evicted, especially when Kory Read stood there and said no one was getting in, as they don’t want to worry about their stuff going missing. That was why the member said what he did, it was due to what they said there themselves!

There was no “fixing” this issue, not when Kory Read shows he deliberatly broke the rules. Why would he expect the property owner to “fix” a situation that they created? Did Kory Read want the owners to “give in ” to the threats of having a domain online in the property address? Did Kory Read try to “bribe” the owner, like he tried with me? I do wonder about that.

Instead, they write such a self-promoting document, claiming it was the responsibility of the property owners to “fix” it, as noted in #10 below and Kory Read once agains issues a document filled with his personal opinions and implications.

Kory Read tries so hard to claim that I misled the LTB about their behaviour, he never admits to HRTO in his documents like this, that he said it in his own words. Even though all his actions are in black and white on paper from them, they still deny doing it. Why? 

(EXHIBIT# 109)Alto Properties Inc. owner again sat on their hands and allowed their alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to mislead the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Member Kevin Lundy into believing that •· The tenancy, which commenced in June, 2015 has been plagued by both hostility and profound lack of cooperation”

  1. The tenancy, which commenced in June, 2015 has been plagued by both hostility and a profound lack of cooperation, as decided by LTB Member Lundy.

Of course, Kory Read leaves a lot out of this document of the decisions released, as it states in the Eviction Order released that they did it to themselves.  https://canlii.ca/t/hpbxw>

  1. 4.   When S.R. attended at the rental unit on August 24, 2017 at 3:15 p.m., KR. refused access to the residence as he believed that a contractor should have attended at 9:00 a.m. to conduct repairs.  There was no suggestion that the Tenant had not received the notice of entry or the letter explaining the need to inspect the bathroom ceiling.  Although the Tenant took the position that S.R. had no need to take photographs of the ceiling as this was an ongoing issue, I find nothing unreasonable in the Landlord’s intention to record the damage for possible future reference by a contractor.  This would potentially reduce the need for multiple visits by a contractor to inspect the unit prior to commencing repairs.  If the problem had been ongoing since 2015 as the Tenant maintained with no work conducted in several months, it is entirely likely that the damage to the affected area had worsened since the last repairs were conducted.  As a result, updated images would allow a contractor or the Landlord’s staff to more accurately determine the next step needed to resolve the issue.
  2. 5.   While it may have been more convenient for the Tenant or KR. for the inspection to take place in the morning, the Tenant had no authority to dictate when the entry took placeThere was also no requirement that either the Tenant or K.R. be present when S.R. attended at the unit.  Although some of S.R.’s past notices of entry were provided in less than 24 hours of the time of entry, this was not one of them.
  3. 6.   When KR. responded at the door of the rental unit on August 24, 2017, he accused S.R. of racism and suggested that she was scheming to evict all of the black people from the residential complex.  This conflict relates to an incident in June, 2016 when the Tenant and K.R. encountered S.R. at a local restaurant.  K.R. testified that S.R. had made racially insensitive comments with respect to the Tenant’s background and that of her son.  Although S.R. denied K.R.’s allegations, it is worth noting that she made a similar comment at the hearing, though appeared oblivious to the offence that this caused to the Tenant and K.R.  Whatever one may conclude regarding the level of K.R.’s outrage at these statements, it was clear at the hearing that his indignation was genuine.  However, this cannot be taken as evidence that S.R.’s comments necessarily dictated her actions as a superintendent, particularly as there was no defect on the notice of entry served on August 22, 2017.
  4. 7.   Conversely, KR.’s allegations of racism, while no doubt unpleasant, do not necessarily amount to harassment.  There was no indication that he used vulgar language to S.R., threatened her, or did anything more than passionately express his views from the door of the residence.  While he may well have been rude to S.R. in the course of venting his displeasure, on the evidence, I do not find that this conduct rises to the seriousness of a breach of the Act.  The Board does not serve as the arbiter of good manners.  As a result, his accusations of racism did not substantially interfere with a lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord.
  5. 8.   However, the same cannot be said with respect to KR.’s unreasonable refusal of access to the rental unit.  By refusing access to the rental unit on August 24, 2017, I find that the Tenant and an occupant of rental unit have substantially interfered with a lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord.

15.   Given the lengthy history of refused access to the rental unit and the Tenant’s and K.R.’s vehement policy of non-cooperation with the Landlord’s employees, I do not find that they would likely comply with a conditional order to cooperate with all lawful notices of entry served by the Landlord.

This document was done in desperation and so full of outright lies and contradictions of what they already said before, it is clear to me. Even reading some of this document will show you what I saw. Kory & Allison Read are Narcissistic Adult Bullies intent on a convoluted elobrate smear campaign and cyberbullying!

They thought that all they had to do, was tell HRTO what I was doing and that would be the end of it. He thought all these convoluted excuses, would benefit his case, when they only hindered him. You can’t pretend to speak for someone else and tell others what they are doing, you don’t have the right.

No one has a right to proceed to tell anyone what he thinks I, or anyone, did. That is all Kory Read has ever done, imply, not prove. He has nothing to prove anythng he claims aginst me and he knew it then and he knows it now.

You can’t provide proof of something that never happened. 


Past Behaviour 1 (Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) list of documents• 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29,30,31, 32

The Applicants forwarded a letter in regards to the newly installed video camera in the elevator on August 29, 2016.

Alto Properties Inc. owner and now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy decided that instead of moving the video camera 6 inches to the left or place it on the east wall of the elevator.

The 3 Respondents left it where it was so it had direct sight into the Applicants unit when opening their door after exiting the elevator.

It has been proven that there was no requirement for the video camera to stay in that current position, that a better and wider “direct view” of the elevator door could have be obtained by simple moving it.

What was also proven is that by moving the video camera, the only” direct view” that would have been lost was that into the Applicants unit upon exiting the elevator.

It has also been proven by the newly installed surveillance system that was placed in the elevator is in the same area that was requested by the Applicant in August of 2017 and were denied by the 3 Respondents.

Alto Properties Inc. owner okayed the new surveillance systems position, despite back in August 2017 claiming that the current view was the only view that had” direct sight” of the problem area.

So why did Alto Properties Inc. owner and now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy refuse to move the video camera the first time when the Applicants asked?

Why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner not try and” FIX” this, NONSENSE”?

Past Behaviour #2I Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) list or documents• 38,39, 4

1st illegal NS (August 31, 2016)- It was proven by the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Member Kevin Lundy that this NS given out by the 3 Respondents was given illegally as there was no 24-hour notice given and the Applicants had the right to refuse entry when Alto Properties Inc. owner and/or the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy appeared at their door requesting entry.

Again, why did Alto Properties. owner encouraged the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc.

Property Manager Stella Reddy to issue the Applicants this illegal N5?

It appears that Alto Properties Inc. owner encouraged the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to pursue her own racially motivated actions of harassment, discriminating and acting in a reprisal manner in a joint effort.

Why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner not try and” FIX., this .. NONSENSE”?

Past Behaviour#’.3(Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) list of documents• 41,42, 43,44, 45,46, 47, 48, 49

The Applicants on August 31, 2016 outlined in an 8-page letter to Alto Properties Inc. owner their previous concerns about the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy. If at the time Alto Properties Inc. owner were so concerned in regards to the Applicants concerns. Alto Properties Inc. owner could have freely asked the Applicants for more details and insight as to what was going on.

But they deliberately refused to!

Instead, Alto Properties Inc. owner decided that they only wanted to hear one side of the story and they relied solely upon the lies of the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy who stated•· She has never been there:” as being the onty actual facts about the situation.

Why were Alto Properties Inc. owner not concerned about the racially charged language and prejudice slurs used by their now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy when brought up by the Applicants?

Was it because they took the same view as the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy, that the Applicant was just some •·Black” trying to use her complexion to get what she wanted?

Maybe it was that they finally found someone who had shared the same views as them?

Maybe they were afraid that they might be something to the Applicants concerns, and if true they would have to do something about it?

Why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner not try and” FIX,. the situation?

Past Behaviour#4 (Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) List of documents• 55, 57,58

The Applicants on October 17, 2016 outlined in a 2-page letter to Alto Properties Inc. owner how again they were left sitting around all day by their now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy and were only notified of the cancelation by Ace Glass hours past the scheduled time.

Why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner not try and” FIX” this” NONSENSE”?

Past Behaviour #5 (Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) list of documents• 56,59,60,61, 62,63,64, 65, 66,67, 68,69, 70,72,73, 74

2nd illegal N% (October 18, 2016 )-Alto Property Manager Stella Reddy again deliberately does not tell the Applicants that the 2nd scheduled appointment for AceGlass the next day was again cancelled for the second day in a row.

Alto Properties Inc. owner still green light the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to serve the Applicants with another 2nd illegal N5 for refusal of entry.

It was proven by the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Member Kevin Lundy that this 2nd N5 given out by the 3 Respondents was given illegally as there was no 24 hour notice given and the Applicants had the right to refuse entry when Alto Properties Inc. owner and/or the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy appeared at their door requesting entry.

The 3 Respondents knew the appointment being cancelled by AceGlass that same day and the Applicants were not given proper 24 hour notice.

In fact the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy and all the time was having a conversation via emails with the Applicants when she received the cancellation by Ace Glass and still does not tell the Applicants.

Why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner not try and” FIX” this” NONSENSE”?

Past Behaviour #6 ( Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) list of documents • 71

The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy forwards and email to Alto Properties Inc. owner on October 19, 2016 stating” They found the detector not working there, as the battery was missing. Was told by her partner that he removed it and the battery was replaced in June as it was still beeping and said that they were told it would be replaced. Yet, in the letter she sent she didn’t say any of that, just that it was fine as the battery was already changed. No mention in her letter that it still beeped, that they removed the battery due to this beeping.

Want me to have them charged under theFire Code?”

Why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner not find her behaviour and request a little extreme and unusual?

How could they not determine that the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy was unquestionably acting in retaliation manner against the Applicants for constantly call her out on her behaviour to her bosses?

There can be no argument that Alto Properties Inc. owner were on notice about the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy past harassing, discriminating and acting in a reprisal manner and use of racially charged language and statements direct at the Applicants.

At a bare minimum, they had to construe that the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy was acting outside of a normal behaviour and in bad faith by deliberately trying to kick the proverbial Hornets’ Nest.

Alto Properties Inc. owner had to understand that her behaviour and request were” nonsense” and an attempt to retaliate against the Applicants for calling her out to her bosses?

Why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner not try and” FIX” this .. NONSENSE”?

The only explanation is that the 3 Respondents were jointly trying to provoke responses out of the Applicants, like the2 illegal N5’s.

Past Behaviour #7 ( Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) List of documents. 87

It was not until the Applicants receive an email from the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy herself on September 26, 2017 at the LTB hearing where she presented it to the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Member Kevin Lundy as evidence against the Applicants for Refusal of Entry that the Applicants gained some valuable insight and it begin lo clarify what I believe the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Properly Manager Stella Reddy Obsessive Compulsive Behaviour or OCD to have the Applicants removed from the building.

After reading this email, Alto Properties Inc. owner had to see and realize her Obsessive Compulsive behaviour or OCD and her immoral behaviour towards the Applicant was playing right out front of them.

The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Properly Manager Stella Reddy in and email on August 24, 2017 stated• Sorry, I can’t take this lying down anymore and I filed a personal complaint with the Human Rights against them for their behaviour. It is already gone as it was the first thing I did when I got home. They need to learn that because she is black they can’t throw out these accusations of racism and bigotry against people who don’t give them what they want or do things the way they want. This is the fallback to intimidate me to do things their way and I can’t do it anymore. The fact that they made all these accusations last year and nothing was done about it, they think they can keep it up and get away with it and it need to stop,”

It appears that after just over a year after the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy started working for Alto Properties Inc. owner The truth has finally started to expose itself in this email between employers and their employee.

This email proves that the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy had an axe to grind against the,.Black.., applicant and she wasn’t going to “take this lying down anymore” and get her pound of flesh.

The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy stated “they think they can keep it up and get away with it and it needs to stop,”

The question is, how did the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy think she was going to make it stop?

The only real option she had was to try and use her position with Alto Properties Inc. to get them removed from the building. Which in turn now explains her Obsessive-Compulsive behaviour or OCD in her attempts to build a case against the Applicants to have them removed from the building.

Alto Properties Inc. owner want the HRTO to believe that they did not at a minimum concluded that their now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy was acting outside of a normal behaviour and not in bad faith?

Does Alto Properties Inc. owner think that this type of harassment and racist motivated behaviour, racially charged language is normal and acceptable?

Knowing the history of her behaviour towards the Applicants before she even started and her subsequent harassing, discriminating and acting in a reprisal manner since they first met in June 2016?

Past Behaviour#8 (Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) LTB Transcripts

Note: there are portions of the written transcripts that are labelled inaudible to the transcriber, but are clear in the recording where now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy says her prejudice slurs against NewFoundlanders.

On September 26, 2017 at the LTB hearing filed by the 3 Respondents. The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy uses racially charged language and prejudice slurs about NewFoundlanders, the Applicant and her children, her very own nieces and nephews during the public hearing. The whole time being steadfast in her claims to not be a racist.

Her behaviour was so inappropriate that the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Member Kevin Lundy made sure to make a reference about it in his illegal evection order.

Again, how could Alto Properties Inc. owner not at a minimum concluded that their now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy was acting outside of anormal behaviour and in bad faith?

Again, why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner not try and ‘1 FIX”‘ the situation even upon hearing his now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy speak so inappropriately in a public forum and knowing her history of racist motivated behaviour and bad faith towards the Applicants?

Past Behaviour#9  (Please review Applicants Statement of Facts and documents for a more detailed explanation) List of documents• 120

On October 4, 2017 at 9:53 am, Alto Properties Inc. owner knocked on the Applicants unit door. The Applicants husband answered the door and invited Alto Properties Inc. owner and his fire inspector/contractor politely into the unit.

The fire inspector walked in, tested the smoke detector and then left. It took approximately 25 seconds.

Alto Properties Inc. Owner remained in the door, and the fire inspector/contractor left the unit and the Applicants husband turned and notice the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy standing in the hallway in front of the elevator with a clipboard.

The Applicants husband figured the alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy was now going to do her Annual Unit Inspection, but instead everyone walked away towards unit #304.

The Applicants husband than closed the door and continued to wait unit 5:00 for the Annual Unit Inspection to take place that was scheduled for that same day.

At 5:10, the Applicants sent an email to Alto Properties Inc. owner and the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy after waiting over 8 hours for someone to do the Annual Unit Inspection stating ” It is now S:10 pm and you have not returned to do the yearly inspection, You were here this morning to test the fire alarm with your contractor and made absolutely no mention that you would not be returning. I do not appreciate you having me sit here all day waiting for you AGAIN, and you could not be bothered to inform Allison or me that you were not going to return. According to your entry form you were supposed to do fire alarms and yearly inspections today between 9 am and 5 pm. You only completed the fire alarms.

On October 10, 2017- 6 days later, the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy finally responds at 11:49 am to the email that was sent back on October 4, 2017 by the Applicants.

The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy stated “Good Afternoon Mr. Read, Thank you for your email. Due to the hearing that was held on September 26, 2017, and we were waiting for the Hearing Order to come, it was prudent for staff not to attend the apartment to complete the annual inspection. Thank you for your time and if you have any questions please feel free to contact me,”

So it appears that again it was not “prudent at 9:53 am for Alto Properties Inc. owner and his now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to inform the Applicants husband that they would not be returning to the Applicants unit to do the Annual Unit Inspection later that day while standing in the hallway.

So not only this time was it the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy who left the Applicants husband sitting around 8 hours waiting for an appointment that was deliberately cancelled because it wasn’t “prudent., and was deliberately again not notified for a 3rd time.

Now Alto Properties Inc. owner who was in on it also. It had to be Alto Properties Inc. owner final call as to if the Annual Unit Inspection needed to be carried out or not.

It appears that now it was the 2 Respondents found it funny and enjoyed the idea of not notifying the Applicants of the cancelation of the Annual Unit Inspection and acting in bad faith.

It appears that now it was the 2 Respondents found it funny and enjoyed the idea of Applicants sitting around waiting for 8 hours for the Annual Unit Inspection and acting in bad faith.

It appears that now it was the 2 Respondents that found it funny and enjoyed the idea of inconveniencing the Applicants and acting in bad faith.

Again, did the 3 Respondents deliberately not tell the Applicants of the cancellation hoping to again provoke a response?

Past Behaviour #10 On October 25, 2017 Alto Properties Inc. owner had a very friendly and polite conversation with the Applicants husband in the lobby of the building while Alto Properties Inc. owner was waiting for the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to come down the stairs as the elevator was out of service.

During their conversation, Alto Properties Inc. owner stated in his own words that the whole situation is

  • Nonsense and that” it could have got fixed., and that “I never had a bad relationship with you guys.”

Alto Properties Inc. owner  also went on to defend the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy previous racially charged language in mid- June 2016 by stating that she told him” She says, she’s never been there.,.

And yet Alto Properties Inc. owner still allow the appeal in Divisional Court to continue to go forward, despite the case in the LTB hearing being in Alto Properties Inc. owner own words” Nonsense,.” could have been fixed” and “never had a bad relationship,. with the Applicants.

It has to make the HRTO wonder what was the real motivation behind Alto Properties Inc. owner trying to get the Applicants evicted?

At the time of the LTB hearing, getting the eviction of October 03, 2017 in the mail and at the time of Applicants filing the appeal.

Alto Properties Inc. owner  in his own words stated that it was all” Nonsense” “could have been fixed” and he” never had a bad relationship,. with the Applicants, but still

he was okay with the idea of…

the Applicants having to move at the end of a cold October/beginning of November.

he was okay with the idea of …

the Applicants 2 children ( Grades 3 and 9 )having to transfer to new school.

he was okay with the idea of …

the Applicants 2 children having to start all over and try and make new friends in their new schools.

he was okay with the idea of …

the elevator not being in service and the Applicants having to travel up and down 3 narrow flights of stairs, carrying everything they own. ( boxes, fumiture, bedsect. )

he was okay with the idea of…

the Applicants ontv having 3 weeks to find a place to move vs. a normal 2 months.

he was okay with the idea of …

the Applicant and/or her husband have to take time off work to go see places during business hours, losing money that would have helped pay for moving and everyday living.

he was okay with the idea of…

the Applicants having to move on the same day they were schedule to be heard at the LTB for their complaint against the 3 Respondents on October 31, 2017. for their harassment and racist motivated behaviour towards them.

he was okay with the idea of…

the whole situation turning the Applicants world upside down based on his own words” Nonsense» that ” could have been fixed with the tenants that he has” never had a bad relationship, with.

So the HRTO has to wonder, why didn’t Alto Properties Inc. owner decide not to do the morally right thing and just call an end to all this” Nonsense”?

Alto Properties Inc. owner stated that the whole situation was” Nonsense., that it ” could have been fixed., and that he has” never had a bad relationship,. with the Applicants.

And still he chose to ignore all of his own words and feelings about the situation so they continue to fight to have the Applicants evicted from his building?

It appears to the Applicants that there was something much larger holding Alto Properties Inc. owner back from doing what was morally right?

You see Alto Properties Inc. owner  also stated in his comments on October 25, 2017 to the Applicants husband that he was also upset that they had went to the Divisional Court and it” affected., him and” you hit my business., and they” should know better”

There is no debate that he even at times becomes a willing participant alongside his now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy, encouraging and enabling her behaviour.

It appears that another new motivation is that of resentment because the Applicants again have enforced their rights under the law to file an appeal with Divisional Court.

It appears to the Applicants that Alto Properties Inc. owner is irritated that all these legal proceedings are still ongoing and costing him and his business money.

The HRTO has to wonder why a property owner who has” never had a bad relationship., with a tenants, would be so willing to spend more money to fight so hard to have them evicted, knowing it will” affected” him and hit his “business,. over “nonsense,.?

So along with Alto Properties Inc. owner  intentional lack of interest and motivation to correct their now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy harassing, discriminating and acting in a reprisal manner towards the Applicant, in her quest to get them removed from the building.

It appears that Alto Properties Inc. owner now is now also retaliating against the Applicants because they enforced their rights to appeal to Divisional Court and they” should known better”

Despite the fact that Alto Properties Inc. owner saying after the LTB hearing on September 26, 2017 to the Applicants husband he “never had a bad relationship” with them.

(EXHIBIT# 109)Alto Properties Inc. owner again sat on their hands and allowed their alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to mislead the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Member Kevin Lundy into believing that •· The tenancy, which commenced in June, 2015 has been plagued by both hostility and profound lack of cooperation”

  1. The tenancy, which commenced in June, 2015 has been plagued by both hostility and a profound lack of cooperation, as decided by LTB Member Lundy.

(EXHIBIT# 49) And because Alto Properties Inc. owner allowed her to obviously mislead the LTB and their lack of actions, condoning her. It then opened the door for the alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to later make such statements like the relationship between the Applicants and the owners is so” broken” that even if the Divisional Court was to rule in their favor. There is no way they could stay in the building because•·It is just not done.”

So now both these lies have been discredited by Alto Properties Inc. owner who admitted that he” never had a bad relationship” with the Applicants.

It again appears that some of the answers to the Applicants questions of

  1. Why was Alto Properties Inc. owner encouraging her?
  2. Why didn’t Alto Properties owner not try and” FIX” this?

are becoming clear.

There can be no doubt that Alto Properties Inc. owner were in on it and knew what was going on!

It is the Applicants position that as the owners, they are responsible for what goes on in their building with their tenants and staff.

To think that 2 grown adults did not recognize what their alleged former Alto Properties Inc .Property Manager Stella Reddy was doing, would equate to them being some form of simpleton that lacked any common sense.

Which is pretty obvious and inaccurate as they are more than capable of maintain their multiple properties in and around the Toronto area.

let us quickly touch on the previous Property Managers Angie and Chris, who worked for Alto Properties Inc. owner

These are the same Property Managers who threatened and tried to intimidate the Applicants back September 2015 into allow entry into their unit also without proper notice.

According to Alto Properties Inc. owner they were fired because they were” Bad News”. The Applicants have to wonder what does Alto Properties Inc. owner  mean by” Bad News”? Were they fired because they threatened and tried to intimidate one too many tenants?

Were they fired because they tried to entry a tenants unit without giving proper notice?

Was the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy also fired because she lied one to many times or tried to entry into a tenant’s unit without giving proper notice?

It was proven by the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Member Kevin Lundy that the illegal N5’s given before and after September 26, 2017 to the Applicants by the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy were basically illegal and would have no standing in a Tribunal hearing.  

Despite giving the Applicant numerous illegal NS’s, the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy insist that she is •f rule driven person,, and swears she is a” professional” when dealing with tenants.

She has went on to stated that she” actually quotes the regulations, copy and paste directly from the written rules,, as that she ” prefer the rules and regulations of property management to speak,, for her.

So being that the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy admits that she was so informed on the rules and regulations, it only confirms that she willingly knew the NS’s were illegal when creating them, and still she issued them to the Applicant knowing that they did not fall within the rules and regulations set out in the Residential Tenancies Act.

Which means that the only reason the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy issue these illegal NS’s was to intimidate and to retaliate against the Applicants for enforcing their rights under the Residential Tenancies Act and/or calling for her out on her continuous harassing ,discriminating and acting in a reprisal manner to her bosses Alto Properties Inc. owners

(EXHIBIT# 103) It appears that and the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy thought in her email on August 24, 2017 to Alto Properties Inc. resented that fact the this Applicant was” Black” and she even went so far as to convince herself by playing the race card against her.

the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy did this to help her justify to herself, her own actions of harassing, discriminating and acting in a reprisal manner since she started towards the Applicants.

This letter date August 24, 2017 is not the only time that the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy as referred to the Applicant as that “Black”.

(EXHIBIT# 111) On this same day, the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy continued on with her racist rants in an HRTO complaint she filed.

(EXHIBIT# 112) page #9 The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc .Property Manager Stella Reddy stated on page # 9 of her HRTO complaint against the Applicants brother Darwin Charles “Due to the fact that Ms. Read is Black, they are using the fact that I am not as a way to bully me and by making accusations against me as being a racist as a way to intimidate me. “

(EXHIBIT# 112) page# 18 The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy stated on page # 18 of her HRTO complaint against the Applicants brother Darwin Charles” I am tying to do my job as building staff and when they don’t agree with how I do my job, nor the regulations I have to follow the ysay I am racist and a bigot and out to get them because she is black.”

So it appears that 3 times in the same day, the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy played the race card claiming that the” Black” Applicant is black and is trying to use her” Black”  completion to “Bully” and “intimidate” her.

The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy also states that the” Black” Applicant is ” using the fact that I am” white.

So not only does the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy played the race card claiming that the” Black” Applicant is black and is trying to use her “Black” complexion to” Bully” and ” intimidate” her. She also says that the” Black” Applicant is only doing it because she is white.

let it be noted that the Applicants HAYE NEYER referred to the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc Property Manager Stella Reddy whiteness as being any source of her harassing, discriminating and acting in a reprisal manner against them.

It is clear by this point that Alto Properties Inc. owner could not give any less of a concern in regards to the harassing, discriminating and acting in a reprisal manner of their beloved now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy.

It appears that this is type racist behaviour is a requirement when applying for the position of Property Manager at 859 Kennedy Road. You must be willing to try and intimidate tenants with eviction if they stand up for their rights under the law to a proper 24 hour Notice of Entry.

By this point a normal person would hear all the bells and whistles going off in their head. Alto Properties Inc. owner had to of known that all the N5’s were illegal as the Applicants pointed it out for them in their letters addressed to them.

But yet again they were okay with the idea of them just sitting on their hands during all this” Nonsense”that” could have been fixed”‘ but in the end, it appears that their personal beliefs against the Applicants out weighted what was morally right and in good faith.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: