Accusations Are NOT Proof

Accusations

Accusations made by toxic tenants against me hold no validity without evidence. The document they submitted, titled “Statement of Facts,” should have been called “Statement of Assumptions” instead. Their allegations were solely based on their feelings and thoughts, lacking substantial evidence. The writing is riddled with hearsay and personal assumptions, manipulatively trying to shape others’ perspectives.

While it can be disconcerting, it is crucial to set aside our egos and emotions, understanding that this situation is not about us but rather about the toxic person attempting to tarnish our image. It is important to note that while some individuals may believe their words, there will be far more who won’t.

I have come to realize that when encountering content like this on websites, it is often a smear campaign and cyberbullying. Statements like the one below exemplify their emotions rather than presenting factual evidence they can substantiate.

In their documents, KR mentioned that “he stood there for a few seconds just looking at Stella Reddy, thinking how she was a phony and an outright liar.” Merely because KR held such thoughts about me does not mean others should follow suit.

As the person below aptly states, feelings are not facts. They are interpreting circumstances based on their emotions rather than supported evidence. Their resentment towards me is evident through their overwhelmingly negative rhetoric.

They have ascribed emotional significance to my job responsibilities where none existed. We were all tenants, and my duties were no different. Malice and ill intentions were attributed to every action and word I uttered during my daily job, solely pertaining to these specific tenants. Their belief that it was personal only to them shapes everything they express.

The toxic tenants’ feelings of resentment and malice have distorted their judgment, leading them to assume that I might harbour hatred toward them. However, they lack any evidential basis to support their claim, relying solely on their suspicions. I told them many times I had no ill will towards them or any tenant, I was just doing my job.

Believing their feelings equate to undeniable facts, they assert their statements as absolute truths. They assume that since some of my job duties impacted their comfort, it was a deliberate attempt to harm them personally.

Their allegations also include the baseless feeling that I attempted to intimidate and threaten them into compliance with my desires. I have included further examples of these “feelings” they articulated below for reference. It is clear that they have no understanding of the reality.

However, just because they perceive my actions and words in this manner does not mean they accurately represent my intentions. They merely assume to know my motivations without truly understanding them.

I obtained this list from the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario website, which is no longer registered but still accessible through the Internet Archive. It contains an edited version of the “Statement of Facts” they submitted as their human rights complaints against me.

This website serves as an outlet for toxic adult bullies to express their emotions, as showcased by the examples provided below. Initially, it bothered me to see these things on the website, but as I grasped their true intentions, I now find it laughable. Their behaviour and comments showcased on these websites solely reflect their characters, not mine, as they have no knowledge of who I truly am.

They are strangers attempting to convince others that, as tenants, they intimately knew me. Educating myself on the traits evident in their documents and websites has opened my eyes and liberated me from their influence. To me, their attempts to deceive total strangers with their toxic words and actions only reveal their idiocy.

I hope that upon reading their content, you will also recognize the toxicity of their words and actions. It is imperative for us to safeguard ourselves against individuals with such toxic mindsets.

http://web.archive.org/web/20210114141432/https://socialjusticetribunalsontario.ca/timeline-of-facts-and-events-8/

  • stating in a threatening and bully manner 
  • stated in a bully tone 
  • He then stood there for a few seconds just looking at Stella Reddy thinking how she was a phony and an outright liar.
  • was willing to make herself look like a bold face liar just to try and prove her inaccurate point.
  • At that very moment the interracial married couple / tenants began to feel that Stella Reddy was trying to intimidate and threaten them into compliance with being okay with what she wanted.
  • But now it was Stella Reddy who was trying to intimidate and threaten interracial married couple / tenants into compliance with an eviction for questioning her on how they were supposed to pay her rent.
  • After some more conversation between the parties, Stella Reddy finally either realized that she was being video recorded and/or just realized that this was a no win situation 
  • At this point the reader needs to begin to focus on what is going to become ongoing pattern. From this point on, the interracial married couple/tenants will began pointing out all of Stella Reddy’s deliberately inaccurate statements that always seem to benefit herself, her situation and always put her in a favorable light.
  • The interracial married couple / tenants will also be pointing out how Stella Reddy likes to embellish or just outright lie upon the interracial married couple / tenants and no matter how minor the statement is.
  • Stella Reddy ALWAYS lies and portrays herself as being in a hostile environment and that the interracial married couple/tenants are always the irrational and uncivilized and that they are always being the ones who are being uncooperative and unreasonable.
  • The interracial married couple / tenants were taken back by how much Stella Reddy had exaggerated, embellished and even lied about the entire conversation they had the day previously.
  • The interracial married couple/tenants could not believe that Stella Reddy used statements like
  • The interracial married couple/tenants were equally perplexed by what was written in the letter, among the exaggerated, embellished and outright lies. 
  • Being so confused by the content of the incorrectly dated letter, the interracial married couple / tenants thought that maybe Stella Reddy might have somehow confused their conversation the day before with someone else? It just made no sense to them where all this came from.
  • At this time the interracial married couple/tenants began to suspect that based on their previous inappropriate conversation in June at Dragon Hand Roll Buffet. And July’s interaction when they attempted to pay only $121 cash for their rent and now this sudden letter that was full of exaggerated, embellished and lies. That thought that maybe Stella Reddy might have some animosity towards them.
  • There was no doubt in their minds that Stella Reddy had clearly and deliberately written the letter in a way to cast an unfavorable light upon them. It also clear to the interracial married couple / tenants that Stella Reddy had some form of an alternative and personal motive behind her actions.
  • The interracial married couple/tenants decided they better email Stella Reddy in regards to their conversation from the day before as to see what Stella Reddy’s response would be.
  • It is so painful obvious that after reading Alto Properties Inc. property manager Stella Reddy inaccurately dated letter and reviewing emails and events/conversation of what happened on August 2, 2016.
  • Stella Reddy from that day started plotting her case to have the interracial married couple/tenants and their bi-racial children removed from 859 Kennedy Road for some racist and anti-black motivation.
  • Stella Reddy inaccurately dated her letter deliberately and created and placed negative, bias and a deceptive recall of events that without any doubts, would make any person reading the inaccurately dated letter believe that the interracial married couple/tenants were acting uncivilized, unreasonable and uncooperative.
  • It appears that Stella Reddy was relying on the hope that the events and what happened on  August 2, 2016, would just come down to her word verse the word of the interracial married couple/tenants who would have already be tainted by her inaccurately dated letter.
  • It will also be shown later in this website that there can no longer be any doubted that when you speak to Stella Reddy in any kind of tone, and/or you appear to disrespect her self-appointed authority over you when speaking with her.
  • That Reddy will suddenly exaggerate, embellish, lie about events and conversations and the tones used by the other party during the conversation in order to cast a negative light upon the interracial married couple / tenants.
  • The only thing that can be construed about Stella Reddy actions is that she did not want to take the interracial married couple/tenants money for the remaining rent for one or more reasons.
  • Stella Reddy hoped that the interracial married couple/tenants would just finally get tired of the conversation and leave the office and not pay her rent? Therefore eventually allowing Stella Reddy to file with the Landlord Tenant Board to have her evicted for non-payment of rent as she previously threatened to do. And/or…
  • Stella Reddy refused the interracial married couple / tenants payment of rent just out of spite because of some pre-existing racist and prejudice views against non-whites. And / or…
  • Stella Reddy refuses the interracial married couple/tenants payment just out of spite because of some pre-existing prejudice and racist views against the interracial married couple / tenants interracial relationship. And / or
  • Stella Reddy refuses the interracial married couple/tenants payment just out of spite because of some pre-existing prejudice and racist views against the interracial married couple/tenants their bi-racial 
    “Mulatto” 
    children. And / or…
  • Stella Reddy refused the interracial married couple/tenants payment because she just liked the idea of causing the interracial married couple/tenants some form of inconvenience and stress.  And / or…
  • Stella Reddy refused the interracial married couple/tenants payment because she just wanted to show the interracial married couple/tenants that she was in charge and that they were not allowed to challenge her authority. And / or…
  • Stella Reddy went back to the building to search/review the interracial married couple/tenants file, where she notice that they were currently getting social assistance and for some reason had issue with it. And / or…
  • Stella Reddy just refuse to take the interracial married couple/tenants rent because she enjoyed the idea of knowing  that it would inconvenience the interracial married couple/tenants financially and that the interracial married couple / tenants would have to run around and pay every month get money orders made.
  • What the reader needs to ask themselves is who really had the issue with taking the interracial married couple/tenants $121 cash for their remaining rent? 
  • What the reader also needs to ponder is. Did Alto Properties Inc. owners and/or Stella Reddy suddenly implement these new policies in regards to rent payments in hopes of targeting the interracial married couple/tenants for eviction based on the fact of non-payment of rent and/or based on late payments of rent as mentioned by Stella Reddy? 
  • It also needs to be noted that Stella Reddy was at first was “Not Comfortable” with the idea of taking cash. It than became an issue of “Liability”  and now in the letter dated August 1, 2016 to the female from the interracial married couple/tenants. Stella Reddy now suddenly fears for her “Personal Safety.”
  • It appears that Stella Reddy has continued to modify her excuses for not wanting to accept the female from the interracial married couple/tenants $121 cash payments for her remaining rent as a way to stress and inconvenience them.
  • Since that “one time”  e-transfer back in August 2016. The female from the interracial married couple/tenants had decided that they would send any remaining amount of owed rent via the e-transfer method to Alto Properties inc. if they liked it or not.
  • Since that “one time” e-transfer back in August 2016. The female from the interracial married couple/tenants has been paying their rent on time and in full via the e-transfer method to Alto Properties Inc. if they liked it or not.
  • It is pretty obvious that Stella Reddy had more than enough and better alternative options and choices to inform the interracial married couple/tenants of the cancellation. But Stella Reddy instead chose the worse and slowest possible methods of getting in contact with them to give them the cancellation information at 3:00 pm via an email.
  • It is pretty clear that Stella Reddy again just enjoyed the idea of, and was trying to deliberately inconvenience and stress the interracial married couple/tenants by making them sit around waiting for an appointment that only she knew was never going to happen earlier that day.
  • It also appears that besides waiting until after the scheduled 4-hour waiting period for the appointment had passed before Stella Reddy notifying the interracial married couple/tenants of the cancellation.
  • Stella Reddy also enjoyed the idea of and was trying to deliberately inconvenience and stress the interracial married couple/tenants by rescheduling Terminix  Canada the following day ( back to back ) without even consulting with the female from the interracial married couple/tenants to see if it work with their family? As it was clearly under the 24 hour time period as mandated by the Ontario Residential Tenancies Act for the reschedule has not being followed.
  • Was Stella Reddy hoping that the interracial married couple/tenants could not be presence the following day when she took it upon herself to reschedule the Terminix Canada to return under the illegal 24 hour time period as mandated by the Ontario Residential Tenancies Act?
  • Was Stella Reddy hoping that this would be the perfect opportunity to get into the interracial married couple/tenants unit without anyone being present so she could look around and report back to Alto Properties Inc. owner on what she had seen and found?
  • Was Stella Reddy hoping that the female from the interracial married couple/tenants would refuse?
  • Was Stella Reddy hoping the family dog/pet, Cassie would not be locked down and therefore she and the Terminix Canada technician would be unable to enter the unit?
  • It appears that Stella Reddy was hoping for any of these above scenarios so she could serve the interracial married couple/tenants with a invalid and illegal N5 – Notice to End your Tenancy for Interfering with others, Damage or overcrowding as a way to build a case to have the interracial married couple/tenants removed from the building.
  • Reviewing the website https://sjtomemberkevinlundy.com you will clearly see that the racist SJTO member Kevin Lundy address and acknowledges these illegal N5 but ignores the law in his attempts to protect his fellow Caucasian Stella Reddy, to evict the interracial married couple/tenants and their bi-racial children.

Discover more from Stella Reddy's Story

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.