Stella Reddy's Story

Absolute privilege means that the person making the statement has the absolute right to make that statement at that time, even if it is defamatory. In other words, the person making the defamatory statement is immune from a defamation lawsuit. In general, absolute privilege exempts persons from liability for potentially defamatory statements made:

Absolute privilege is a defence that applies to shield speech from claims in defamation where they are spoken on a recognized occasion of such a privilege. The privilege attaches to the occasion, not the content, of the speech.

During any Tribunal hearing in Ontario, I had to stand there as a representative of the property owners, or Property Management Company, and explain in detail what occurred during the Tenants Tenancy. In the process of Landlord and Tenant Board, I stood there on Sept 26, 2017, and had to repeat everything that was said to me, or about me, by these Tenants.

Those statements I made during this process, of repeating all I was told from the Tenants, using the words they assigned to me, are covered under Absolute Privilege. They cannot be used against me in any other Tribunal system, like HRTO.

How else was I to let the Adjudicator know what was said if I didn’t repeat it, including all the words they accused me of saying? 

No, I am not a lawyer, but I was very well trained in the Residential Tenancies Act and the rules of the Landlord and Tenant Board, and as an employee of the owners, I was able to represent them. Just as the adjudicator allowed KR to represent his wife during the proceeding, even though he wasn’t a lawyer either!! No different…

This section below I got from KR & AR Reply with Human rights where they write about Absolute Privilege and how they believe that just because I was not a Lawyer or a witness, I was not allowed to use it. 

That isn’t true. I was representing the property owners in a judicial Tribunal and had no choice than repeat what was said during interactions, defamatory words or not. I didn’t say them myself, I was repeating what I was told by these tenants that I said to them. 

I also find more evidence of these Toxic people once again completely invalidating me and any personal choices I made. Every way they could they would disrespect me as an individual with the right to make my own decisions and choices, right or wrong, they do it.

While I appreciate that these Toxic Adult Bullies may want to dictate to others how to do their jobs, they don’t have the authority to do so. It is for writings like this, that they were losing with HRTO. These things have nothing to do with proving violations of their Human rights as they claimed in their applications.

They were so intent on trying to prove I was a liar, and showing how I should have done my job than proving how I violated their Human Rights. 

They made huge errors, as it was not the purpose of any applications with Human Rights being filled with more questions than answers. They constantly asked more questions and speculated on almost every word I said and every move I made, trying to rationalize everyone into his way of thinking.

They filed these 4 applications and it was their job to prove allegations of racism and discrimination, not go on and on about how I chose to do the duties of my job there and how it should have been done. It also wasn’t their place to speculate so much over why they think I did or said something! 

It is also not part of applications for the Applicants to speculate on what THEY THINK is going on, but to provide actual evidence of their claims, not use so much conjecture.

---

This finding certainly applies to now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy as her racially charged language, prejudice slurs and her own racially motivated actions in a public forum at the LTB hearing on September 26, 2017 had nothing to do with the 3 Respondents filing for Refusal of Entry.
There was absolutely no reason for now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to try and justify her racist beliefs as legal the only issue before the LTB was did the Applicants refuse her entry, YES OR NO?
The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy may have wanted to discuss the conversation that transpired between the Applicants. But in actuality all she had to do was state I gave proper Notice and I was refused.. Done…
The Act is very clear about that.
There was absolutely no reason for her to bring up what happened or what was said. It had absolutely nothing to do with…DID THE APPLICANTS ALLOW YOU IN YES OR NO?
Again there was no need for now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to utter the slur “ Newfie ” numerous times in front of the Applicants, arbitrator and public.
The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy may have wanted to discuss this topic, but in actuality, all she had to do was statI gave proper Notice and I was refused.. Done…

The Applicants found the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy prejudice slurs offensive about New Foundlanders and to be unwanted harassment, despite it not being directly towards them.
The Applicants position is that a person does not have to possess a certain characteristic themselves for it to be considered unwanted harassment.
Again there was no need for the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy to say the racially charged “ Mullato ” statement towards and in the presence of their children again.
The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy may have wanted to discuss this topic, but in actuality all she had to do was state
I gave proper Notice and I was refused.. Done…
The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy statement was insensitive and shameful and it is classified as harassment.
Again the racially motivated conduct the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy was unwanted and not needed in a public LTB hearing.
This was the 2nd time the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy had referred to the Applicants children as “ Mullato ” in their presence and in a public area.
The Applicants wants to remind the HRTO the racial charged slur “ Mulatto ” is a considered a derogatory term by society, because came into use during slavery when referring to the bi-racial offspring of African slaves and most often their white European slave masters.
The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy also stated my “ I have very beautiful great nephews and nieces who are half black, and my nephew is as black as you can get. He’s even darker than she is. ”” while point at the Applicant, embarrassing and shaming her about her complexion.
Again all the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy may have wanted to discuss this topic, but in actuality all she had to do was state
I gave proper Notice and I was refused.. Done…
But instead the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy wanted to either imply to Applicant that despite her great “ nephew ” being even “ darker than she is ” that he is still beautiful.
So one has to wonder if her great nephew had a lighter complexion than the Applicant, would she still think he is as
beautiful?
Did the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy also mean to imply to the Applicant

The real irony of this whole racially charged language and actions “ He’s even darker than she is. ” that were made by the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy in perjury at the LTB hearing. Is that her great nephew has a far lighter complexion than the Applicant herself

So now that it has been confirmed that her great nephew has a lighter complexion than the Applicant. Does she really still think he is more beautiful than when he was untruthfully darker?
So what was the motive behind the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy making this racially charged deliberately misleadingly derogatory statement?
Does the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy believe that by committing perjury, using racially charged language and prejudice slurs and actions in a public forum proves that she is not a racist?
How does her nieces and nephews having children with individuals that have a different skin complexion make her not a racist?
The facts are that the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy has no control over whom her nieces and nephews date and who the decided to have children with!

The real irony of this whole racially charged language and actions “ He’s even darker than she is. ” that were made by the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy in perjury at the LTB hearing. Is that her great nephew has a far lighter complexion than the Applicant herself.
It is the position on the Applicant that any perjury that is committed in the act of a legal proceeding is not covered by absolute privilege because it is uttered with malice and intent to deceive the system.
The topic that now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy lied and committed perjury about was not a topic relating to the Entry of Refusal.
And the lie and perjury itself that was committed by the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy is not a topic of the Refusal of Entry itself.
They only way it could be considered absolute privilege is to say that lie and perjury were part of the hearing in some strange way. The fact that the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy lied and committed perjury does not absolve her of absolute privilege any more under Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Member Sophie Martel.

It was the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy who was the first person use racially charged language and prejudice slurs at the LTB hearing on September 26, 2017.
It is the Applicants position that none of it had any relevance or purpose at the LTB hearing for their request for an eviction order for Refusal of Entry by the 3 Respondents.
The questions here is what was real reason behind the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy sudden mysterious use of all this racially charged language and prejudice slurs and actions in a public forum at the LTB hearing?
What was real reason behind the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy filing all the letters from the Applicants where they called her out about her racist behaviour from a year earlier?

Was she thinking that her racially charged language and prejudice slurs and actions could not be used against her, because she was coached, maybe by some familiar with the law into believing that it would qualify as absolute privilege?
It would have been a win, win, win and win for the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy in her mind.
( win #1 ) She could provoke a negative response from the Applicants, ( win #2 ) use it against them in the LTB hearing, (win #3) and in Small Claims Court, and ( win #4 ) there is nothing the Applicants could do about it, as she believed it would be covered by absolute privilege.

With the above facts, the Applicants take the position that the now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy racially charged language and prejudice slurs and actions were not need and uncalled for in the LTB hearing, and in fact may have been said and done as a way to protect herself from any future litigation .
The now alleged former Alto Properties Inc. Property Manager Stella Reddy her racially charged language, prejudice slurs and her own racially motivated actions ARE NOT PROTECTED by absolute privilege as they were uttered not for the purposes of judicial proceedings as a witness